中文

本原非亏数是否必有一个不太大于其根的子分量?

数论 2024-12-12 v3

摘要

nn 为一个本原非亏数,其中 n=p1a1p2a2pkakn=p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2} \cdots p_k^{a_k}p1,p2pkp_1, p_2 \cdots p_k 为互异素数。我们证明存在某个 ii 使得 piai+1<2k(p1p2p3pk).p_i^{a_i+1} < 2k(p_1p_2p_3\cdots p_k). 我们猜想事实上总可找到某个 ii 使得 piai+1<p1p2p3pk{p_i}^{a_i+1} < p_1p_2p_3\cdots p_k

关键词

引用

@article{arxiv.2005.12115,
  title  = {Must a primitive non-deficient number have a component not much larger than its radical?},
  author = {Joshua Zelinsky},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12115},
  year   = {2024}
}

备注

8 pages. This version tighter bounds than the first version due to a suggestion by Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta