Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity"
适应与自组织系统
2009-10-31 v1 混沌动力学
摘要
We respond to the comment by Crutchfield, Feldman and Shalizi and that by Binder and Perry, pointing out that there may be many maximum entropies, and therefore ``disorders'' and ``simple complexities''. Which ones are appropriate depend on the questions being addressed. ``Disorder'' is not restricted to be the ratio of a nonequilibrium entropy to the corresponding equilibrium entropy; therefore, ``simple complexity'' need not vanish for all equiibrium systems, nor must it be nonvanishing for a nonequilibrium system.
关键词
引用
@article{arxiv.nlin/0003026,
title = {Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity"},
author = {JS Shiner and Matt Davison and PT Landsberg},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:nlin/0003026},
year = {2009}
}
备注
submitted to PRE