Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin
A recent post by Tim Maudlin to this archive (arXiv:1408.1828) was entitled "Reply to Werner". However, it was not clear to what text this was supposed to be a reply. Here I briefly provide this context, and show that Maudlin's post is as…
Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].
Comment on ``On Random Scan Gibbs Samplers'' [arXiv:0808.3852]
This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].
New cases of the multiplicity conjecture are considered.
The aim of this short note is to give counterexamples to two results by D. Y. Gao [5, Th. 16], [4, Th. 2] and to improve a related result by S.-C. Fang, D. Y. Gao, R.-L. Sheu and S.-Y. Wu [1, Th. 3].
Brief response to a Reply [arXiv:1005.2615] on our Comments [arXiv:1005.0838] on XENON100 recent results [arXiv:1005.0380].
We show that the comment [cond-mat/0408217] by Continentino on our recent paper [PRL 91, 066404 (2003), cond-mat/0212335] reaches incorrect conclusions as the comment wrongly extrapolates from results valid close to a classical phase…
In a Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 029801 (2014)] on our Letter on self-propelled asymmetric particles [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 198302 (2013); arXiv:1302.5787], Felderhof claims that our theory based on Langevin equations would be…
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
Answer to cond-mat/0106005 and cond-mat/0106006 and additional notes are given concerning to my previous comment (cond-mat/0105324).
We reply the comment made by Caracciolo et al. (cond. mat./0305213) to our work "Dynamic behavior of anisotropic non-equilibrium driving lattice gases", cond-mat/021041.
We critically analyze a recent paper by D. Mermin and we compare his statements with Bell's position on the problems he is discussing.
A Comment on the Letter by B. Kraus {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}{\bf 104}, 020504 (2010).
This is a reply to Johansen's comment on `Are Financial Crashes Predictable?', by L. Laloux, M. Potters, R. Cont, J.P. Aguilar, J.P. Bouchaud, Europhys. Lett. 45, p. 1 (1999).
Reply to ``Comment on [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 630 (1998)]''
Samuely et al. (cond-mat/0503153) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our…
This is the reply to the comment arXiv:0801.4620 by Vidal, Dusuel, and Schmidt.
These exercises complement my notes "Derived categories, resolutions, and Brown representability".
Comment on Causal Inference in the Medical Area [math.ST/0612783]