Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin

Correction to Bernoulli (2006), 12, 551--570 http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bj/1151525136

A comment on the recent paper of R Manica, J N Connor, L Y Clasohm, S L Carnie, R G Horn, D Y C Chan, Transient response of a wetting film to mechanical and electrical perturbations, Langmuir 2008, 24, 1381.

Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 76, p.3886 (1996); astro-ph/9605001). We clarify these issues and show that our results are robust, and there is no…

Comment on ``Lancaster Probabilities and Gibbs Sampling'' [arXiv:0808.3852]

To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. together with the author's Reply.

I refute the criticisms of hep-ph/0311241 raised in hep-ph/0312151.

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

The Reply to G. W. Bruhn is added.

This reply tries to rectify some misunderstandings that are in our opinion contained in the Comment by Campostrini and Rossi, <hep-lat 99407008> on our paper <hep-lat 9407003>.

This is our response to the comment arXiv:2504.13683 posted by Chat\'e and Solon in reference to our preprint arXiv:2503.17064

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).

In their reply arXiv:1408.2230, the authors corrected some inappropriate sentences and clarified misleading descriptions in their original manuscript arXiv:1407.5194v1.

It is shown that the recent criticism of Brevik et al. (hep-th/0004041) is in error.

Comment on [math.ST/0612817]

Some comments are made on the matrices which serve as the basis of a quaternionic algebra. We show that these matrices are related with the quaternionic action of the imaginary units from the left and from the right.

This is a response to the commentaries on "CoRR: A Computing Research Repository".

The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…

This is to reply to a recent comment by Yang, Yuan and Zhang on ``Teleportation of two-quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resorces''.

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Comment on "The Need for Syncretism in Applied Statistics" [arXiv:1012.1161]