Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin

The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.

We make corrections on the paper by Sugino [{\it JHEP} {\bf 0501} (2005) 016].

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

A response to a letter to the editor by Schilling regarding Bartroff, Lorden, and Wang ("Optimal and fast confidence intervals for hypergeometric successes" 2022, arXiv:2109.05624)

As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.

This is no longer available.

We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].

This is a reply to a comment of Casati, Chirikov and Zhirov (PRL 85, 896 (2000)) on PRL 83, 5419 (1999). The suitability of the particlar two-time boundary value problem used in the earlier PRL is argued.

The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0802.2019

A reply to the comment by Lee et al. [arXiv:1309.5367]

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Letter/comment on M. Rini, Physics $\textbf{13}$, s94 (July 27, 2020) and A. Sanna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{125}$, 057001 (2020).

Here is response Neutrino-4 collaboration to the note arXiv:2006.13147 on article "Preparation of the Neutrino-4 experiment on search for sterile neutrino and the obtained results of measurements" arXiv:2005.05301. Red text is commentary…

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]

A simple heuristic proof of an integral identity recently derived (Glasser ML 2011 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44 225202) is presented.

This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)

There are some points in the reply of Horton et al. [http://stacks.iop.org/JPhysA/35/7963] to my comment [quant-ph/0202140] on their paper [quant-ph/0103114] which I cannot let stand without a response. I provide here some clarification of…

A short reply to Jarzynski's comment cond-mat/0509344 on my paper ``Flaw of Jarzynski's equality when applied to systems with several degrees of freedom'' (cond--mat/0508721) is presented.

We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.