Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin
Reply to Ikeda (arXiv:0712.3341).
Reply to comment by Jain, Cond-mat 9409012 published in the Physical Review Letters, Number 73, 1052 (1994).
comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289
We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]
This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.
We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).
I reply to the four points raised by S. A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini (arXiv:0909.2956v1) against my comment (arXiv:0907.2020v1) to their previous article. I maintain my position on the wrongness of their…
Reply to a comment by T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W von Keyserlingk [arXiv:2010.07969].
Reply to the comment, cond-mat/0209398 by by N.W. Watkins, S.C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands
Comment on ``Understanding OR, PS and DR'' [arXiv:0804.2958]
Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).
This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081
We reply to the comment cond-mat/9902073 by Ben-Naim and Krapivsky on our paper cond-mat/9901130. We show that their arguments are incorrect, and present more numerical results to back our earlier conclusions.
Withdrawn -- a revised version will appear in due course.
This is a reply to a Comment on 'A test-tube model for rainfall', {\it Europhys. Lett.}, {\bf 106}, 40001, (2014).
This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.
I respond to the Bernard et al. comment on my letter ``Chiral anomalies and rooted staggered fermions.''
In this note I respond to Vilenkin's claim that there must have been a beginning.
We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].
In this note we answer the two questions raised by Y.Y Li and L. Nguyen in their note [LN2] below.