Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin
Rejoinder to "The Future of Indirect Evidence" [arXiv:1012.1161]
A Comment on the Letter by Granger et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135506 (2002).
Two objections have been raised to the arguments presented in O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 80 (1999). It is pointed out that neither objection has anything whatsoever to do with the main subject matter of that paper, and shown that both…
This work is a continuation of what was done in a previous paper and strongly connected to the recent work of U. Abel and I. Rasa [arXiv:1707.00127]
In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.
Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]
Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]
Reply to Comments by Lambrecht, Jaekel, and Reynaud, and by Garcia and Levanyuk, submitted to Physical Review Letters.
Rejoinder: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
L. E. Ballentine's remarks in Physics Today about the QBist interpretation of quantum mechanics are generally wide of the mark.
A comment is given to the reply of Kraemmer and Rebhan (hep-th/9711075) to our paper (hep-th/9710131).
We answer affirmatively the open problem proposed by Cabr\'e and Tan in their paper "Positive solutions of nonlinear problems involving the square root of the Laplacian" (see Adv. Math. {\bf 224} (2010), no. 5, 2052-2093).
This is a Reply to the Comment of S.R. White and D.J. Scalapino [cond-mat/9907243] on our recent paper ``Stripes and the t-J Model'' [Physical Review Letters 83, 132 (1999) and cond-mat/9812022].
It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.
We give an explicit counterexample to an entanglement inequality suggested in a recent paper [quant-ph/0005126] by Benatti and Narnhofer. The inequality would have had far-reaching consequences, including the additivity of the entanglement…
Reply to Comment quant-ph/0506207 by J.G.Brankov et al.
The recent paper nucl-th/0012037 by Moretto et al. is commented
Comment on ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
Comment on ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
Cho and Pak reply to Lamm et al. [hep-th/0007108] comment on "A Convergent Series for the Effective Action of QED" [hep-th/0006057].