Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin
This is the final remark on the replies received to my target paper in the Italian Journal of Linguistics
Rejoinder of "On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle" by Deborah G. Mayo [arXiv:1302.7021].
We regret to point out several inaccurate and misleading statements that Benedetto {\em et al.} make in their Reply to our Comment on their paper titled ``Language Trees and Zipping''.
Discussion of "On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle" by Deborah G. Mayo [arXiv:1302.7021].
We compare the results of our two papers with the results of the paper Aratyn H., Gomes J.F., Zimerman A.H., Higher order Painlev\'e equations and their symmetries via reductions of a class of integrable models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., V.…
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…
It is demonstrated that remarks and criticism in work [1] (arXiv:1005.2436 nucl-th) have resulted from inattentive reading of work [2] (Phys. Rev.C 81, 035501 (2010)) or just some misunderstanding and do not influence conclusions of work…
We fix a gap in the proof of a result in our earlier paper "Generalised notions of amenability, II" (J. Funct. Anal. 254 (2008) 1776-1810), and so provide a new proof to a characterization of amenability for Beurling algebras. The result…
This paper also has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators: gr-qc/0608014, gr-qc/0511095, gr-qc/0505078, gr-qc/0502060, gr-qc/0603027, gr-qc/0606028, gr-qc/0607109, gr-qc/0607110,…
We answer a question of Sean Keel in the affirmative in the case of ruled surfaces
Comment on ``Gibbs Sampling, Exponential Families, and Orthogonal Polynomials'' [arXiv:0808.3852]
We offer o reply for the comments of Rapisarda et al. cond-mat/0601409 on our letter "Entropy of Classical Systems with Long Range Interactios", published in Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol 95 (2005) 190601.
Here we respond briefly to a comment on our work in arXiv:cond-mat/0405501.
In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
This note gives an informal overview of the proof in our paper "Borel Conjecture and Dual Borel Conjecture", see arXiv:1105.0823.
In this paper, we give a short proof of a relation generalizing many identities for Bernoulli numbers.
Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]
Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]
Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]
Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]