Related papers: Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin

We respond to comments on our paper, titled "Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio."

We settled a conjecture of Feigin, Wang and Yoshinaga, appeared in the preprint "Integral expressions for derivations of multiarrangements" (arXiv: 2309.01287v2).

The contents is changed.

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]

This paper replies to the comment by Jefimenko: "Causal equations for electric and magnetic fields and Maxwell's equations: Comment on a paper by Heras" [Am. J. Phys. 76, 101-101 (2008)]."

In the preprint cond-mat/0408050 M. V. Cheremisin noticed that some results (namely Fig. 4) of our recent work (cond-mat/0407364) have been taken from his paper cond-mat/0405176. As clear from the caption to Fig. 4 as well as from the text…

Remarks on mathematical proof and the practice of mathematics.

We reply to a recent comment by Bhattacharya et. al. (cond-mat/9812290) on our previous Letter (PRL 81, 5640 (1998)).

We reply to the recent comment cond-mat/9810097 on our original Letter `Roughening Transition of Interfaces in Disordered Systems', Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1469 (1998).

no abstract for comments

We reply to the comment (cond-mat/9806125) by Essler, Goehmann and Korepin, and show that their points are unfounded.

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

Withdrawn due to error. See D. Lowe, L. Susskind and J. Uglum, hep-th/9402136, for correct treatment. Apologies to all recipients.

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

It is shown that the arguments in the reply of Z.-D. Zhang (arXiv:0812.0194) to the comment arXiv:0811.1802 defending his conjectures in arXiv:0705.1045 are invalid. His conjectures have been thoroughly disproved.

This is an addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), arXiv:0811.0518] to Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601 (2009), arXiv:0810.4791] on Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008), arXiv:0804.1898].

This is the Reply to the Comment by E. Thuneberg refuting the paper by E. B.Sonin [Phys. Rev. B 104, 094517 (2021)] as incorrect. The criticism is based on a misunderstanding of the goal and the approach of the paper and does not provide…

Comment on ``Gibbs Sampling, Exponential Families and Orthogonal Polynomials'' [arXiv:0808.3852]