What Maudlin replied to
Quantum Physics
2014-11-11 v1
Abstract
A recent post by Tim Maudlin to this archive (arXiv:1408.1828) was entitled "Reply to Werner". However, it was not clear to what text this was supposed to be a reply. Here I briefly provide this context, and show that Maudlin's post is as ill-conceived as the original paper (arXiv:1408.1826).
Cite
@article{arxiv.1411.2120,
title = {What Maudlin replied to},
author = {R. F. Werner},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2120},
year = {2014}
}
Comments
5 pages, LaTex; background material not intended for journal publication