On 132-representable Graphs
Abstract
A graph is word-representable if there exists a word over the alphabet such that letters and alternate in if and only if is an edge in . Word-representable graphs are the subject of a long research line in the literature initiated in \cite{KP}, and they are the main focus in the recently published book \cite{KL}. A word avoids the pattern if there are no such that . The theory of patterns in words and permutations is a fast growing area discussed in \cite{HM,Kit}. A research direction suggested in \cite{KL} is in merging the theories of word-representable graphs and patterns in words. Namely, given a class of pattern-avoiding words, can we describe the class of graphs represented by the words? Our paper provides the first non-trivial results in this direction. We say that a graph is 132-representable if it can be represented by a 132-avoiding word. We show that each 132-representable graph is necessarily a circle graph. Also, we show that any tree and any cycle graph are 132-representable, which is a rather surprising fact taking into account that most of these graphs are non-representable in the sense specified, as a generalization of the notion of a word-representable graph, in \cite{JKPR}. Finally, we provide explicit 132-avoiding representations for all graphs on at most five vertices, and also describe all such representations, and enumerate them, for complete graphs.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1602.08965,
title = {On 132-representable Graphs},
author = {Alice L. L. Gao and Sergey Kitaev and Philip B. Zhang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.08965},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
17 pages