English

Word-representability of split graphs

Combinatorics 2017-09-29 v1

Abstract

Letters xx and yy alternate in a word ww if after deleting in ww all letters but the copies of xx and yy we either obtain a word xyxyxyxy\cdots (of even or odd length) or a word yxyxyxyx\cdots (of even or odd length). A graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is word-representable if and only if there exists a word ww over the alphabet VV such that letters xx and yy alternate in ww if and only if xyExy\in E. It is known that a graph is word-representable if and only if it admits a certain orientation called semi-transitive orientation. Word-representable graphs generalize several important classes of graphs such as 33-colorable graphs, circle graphs, and comparability graphs. There is a long line of research in the literature dedicated to word-representable graphs. However, almost nothing is known on word-representability of split graphs, that is, graphs in which the vertices can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. In this paper, we shed a light to this direction. In particular, we characterize in terms of forbidden subgraphs word-representable split graphs in which vertices in the independent set are of degree at most 2, or the size of the clique is 4. Moreover, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for an orientation of a split graph to be semi-transitive.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1709.09725,
  title  = {Word-representability of split graphs},
  author = {Sergey Kitaev and Yangjing Long and Jun Ma and Hehui Wu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.09725},
  year   = {2017}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T21:57:12.392Z