相关论文: Uniqueness of $L^{(1,\infty)}$-Hamiltonians and al…
By adding the total time derivatives of all the constraints to the Lagrangian step by step, we achieve the further work of the Dirac conjecture left by Dirac. Hitherto, the Dirac conjecture is proved completely. It is worth noticing that…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the computation of E(n,x) on page 6 which appears to be essential for the result. The author is currently trying to correct this proof
This paper has been withdrawn due to a critical error near equation (71). This error causes the entire argument of the paper to collapse. Emmanuel Candes of Stanford discovered the error, and has suggested a correct analysis, which will be…
I withdraw my paper from arXiv because there is a technical error in the proof of Theorem 1.1. And because of this error, all the results in the paper are untrue. I am very sorry for this.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in the proof of the main result.
The paper is withdrawn.
This paper is withdrawn due to some gaps in the proof
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a serious gap in the proof of the main theorem.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the incorrect application of the divergence theorem to Eqs 7, 8 and 9.
This paper was withdrawn by the author due to an error in the proof of the main result; essentially the parameter R used in the proof may depend on the manifold (M, g), not just on dimension and pinching constant.
The methods used to prove the main result must be incorrect, as they can be used to arrive at a contradiction with previously known results. Thus the paper was withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn because of serious errors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in claim 1.
This paper has been withdrawn because there is a fundamental error in the computations; with the right computational scheme it seems to be just a version of the Jones polynomial
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The central result is now included in quant-ph/0309056 (as in the journal publication!). An erratum on the Heisenberg perturbation series estimate is also included therein.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because M. Aschenbrenner pointed out that the proof of theorem 3.1 was incorrect.
Let $\text{Ham(M,L)}$ denote the group of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms on a symplectic manifold $M$, leaving a Lagrangian submanifold $L\subset M$ invariant. In this paper, we show that $\text{Ham(M,L)}$ has the fragmentation property, using…
Reason for withdrawal: There is a serious mistake in the calculation of the divisor of the rational section used in the proof of Prop. 2.2.1., and with the correct value the argument does not work.