相关论文: Comment on ``Random-Field Spin Model beyond 1 Loop…

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

In a recent article [Phys. Rev. A 94, 052128 (2016)], the authors compute the predictions of two collapse models on the transition probabilities of neutral mesons. Notably, they claim to find an influence on the decay rates and attempt to…

The low-energy properties of a system at a critical point may have additional symmetries not present in the microscopic Hamiltonian. This letter presents the theory of a class of multicritical points that provide an interesting example of…

Discussion of "Bayesian Model Selection Based on Proper Scoring Rules" by Dawid and Musio [arXiv:1409.5291].

Discussion of "Bayesian Model Selection Based on Proper Scoring Rules" by Dawid and Musio [arXiv:1409.5291].

These lectures describe why one believes there is physics beyond the Standard Model and review the expectations of three alternative explanations for the Fermi scale. After examining constraints and hints for beyond the Standard Model…

We describe some field theoretic methods for studying quantum spin systems in one dimension. These include the nonlinear sigma-model approach which is particularly useful for large values of the spin, the idea of Luttinger liquids and…

We respond to the recent article by S. Goldstein, R. Tumulka, and N. Zangh\`i [arXiv:2309.11835] concerning the spin-dependent arrival-time distributions reported in [S. Das and D. D\"urr, Sci. Rep. 9: 2242 (2019)].

Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Level of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

An overview of the cosmological models with expansion, shear and rotation is presented. Problems of the rotating models are discussed, their general kinematic properties and dynamical realizations are described. A particular attention is…

We review the derivations and conclusions made in Caravelli and Modesto (2010 \textit{Class. Quantum Grav.} \textbf{27} 245022, arXiv:1006.0232) and show that most of the analysis performed there is not valid.

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

A brief account is given of the problems involved in extended the pinch technique beyond the one-loop level, and of investigations into one possible approach to solving them.

Comment on "Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane"

This is a comment on J. Schmittbuhl, A. Hansen, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 045505 (2003). They offer a reply, in turn.

Dujavne et al suggest that the observed spectra are a result of spin-split Landau levels and spin-flip energies reveal composite fermion interactions. We find that the CF effective field formula is incorrect. In fact, CF model is…

Comment on a recent paper published in Physical Review Letters by M. C. Wang, S. Qiao, Z. Jiang, S. N. Luo, and J. Qi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

We comment on the recent paper by N.A. Tornqvist and M. Roos published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1575 (1996).

This note replies Dr. Jensen (2010) comments on Problem 2.3, which was left in Fuh (2010). In the following, we use the same notations and definitions in Fuh (2006) unless specified.

We comment on a Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 080605 (2015), arXiv:1411.1816] "Replica symmetry breaking in trajectories of a driven Brownian particle" and author reply [arXiv:1805.10474]