相关论文: Einstein frame and Jordan frame revisited: are the…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a critical mistake on page 3.
Scalar tensor theories of gravity can be formulated in the Einstein or in the Jordan frame, which are related by the conformal transformations. Although the two frames are describe the same physics, and are equivalent, the stability of the…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a mistake of factor 1/2.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.
We consider the correspondence between the Jordan frame and the Einstein frame descriptions of scalar-tensor theory of gravitation. We argue that since the redefinition of the scalar field is not differentiable at the limit of general…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the data-analysis.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in Thm. 11.
The paper is withdrawn due to an error in Section 2.
In the present comment we discuss the qualitative and the quantitative differences between the neutron stars models in $f(R)$ gravity presented in the recent paper \cite{Capozziello2015} (Capozziello et al. (2015)) and in our paper…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) in the light of several other works available and due to a misunderstanding in the authorships.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in Proposition 2.2.
This paper is withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in equation.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in section 7. There is a new version: arXiv:1011.3352.
The paper was withdrawn by the author. It contained various errors.