相关论文: Einstein frame and Jordan frame revisited: are the…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in example.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the results obtained here had been corrected and appeared in hep-th/0306008.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to inconsistency of the considered working hypothesis. The consistent treatment is presented in the last publications of the author.

This paper is withdrawn. We found a mistake in Lemma 4.1

This paper has been withdrawn, as all conjectures (and one claim) have been proven incorrect. Some of what remains may eventually reappear in a different context.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to incomplete interpretation for the results.

Paper withdrawn due to errors. Revised version may or may not appear in the future.

This article has been withdrawn due to an error in a proof of the main result.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical and experimental error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1

This article was withdrawn by the arXiv.org administrators since it plagiarizes math.AT/0401211.

Jordan and Einstein frame are studied under the light of Hamiltonian formalism. Dirac's constraint theory for Hamiltonian systems is applied to Brans-Dicke theory in the Jordan Frame. In both Jordan and Einstein frame, Brans-Dicke theory…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because the conclusions reached in it are incorrect.

This paper has been withdrawn as it has been superseded by 0808.2697

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial error in the proof of the main theorem

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in claim 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to the crucial wrong assumption following Eq. 9.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in Lemma 3.5.