Algorithm or Creative? A Three-Arm Experimental Design for Decomposing Algorithmic Bias in Platform A/B Tests
摘要
Online advertising platforms host hundreds of thousands of A/B tests, but the platform's delivery algorithm routes each creative to the audience it predicts will engage. Every two-arm test therefore conflates the creative's effect with the algorithm's targeting response, and adjusting for the realized audience is biased because audience is a post-treatment mediator. We propose a three-arm design that adds an arm exposing the algorithm to the treatment metadata while holding the user-facing creative identical to control, point-identifying the natural indirect (algorithmic) and direct (creative) effects without sequential ignorability. In a live Meta campaign with a women-targeted text fragment, the algorithmic channel raises female impression share by +2.07 ppt while the creative channel moves it by -0.68 ppt; roughly three-quarters of the absolute reallocation is algorithmic, and a conventional two-arm test understates the algorithmic channel by a factor of two. The design isolates the contribution of platform's algorithm to the outcome which is separable from creative content.
引用
@article{arxiv.2605.23706,
title = {Algorithm or Creative? A Three-Arm Experimental Design for Decomposing Algorithmic Bias in Platform A/B Tests},
author = {Pallavi Pal and Anjana Susarla},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.23706},
year = {2026}
}