English

A Relativizing MIP for BQP

Quantum Physics 2026-04-15 v1 Computational Complexity

Abstract

Complexity class containments involving interactive proof classes are famously nonrelativizing: although IP=PSPACE\mathsf{IP} = \mathsf{PSPACE}, Fortnow and Sipser showed that that there exists an oracle relative to which coNP⊈IP\mathsf{coNP} \not\subseteq \mathsf{IP}. In contrast, the question of whether the containment BQPIP\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{IP} is relativizing remains wide open. In this work we make progress towards resolving this question by showing that the containment BQPMIP\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{MIP} holds with respect to any classical oracle. We obtain this result by constructing, for any classical oracle OO, a PCP\mathsf{PCP} proof system for BQPO\mathsf{BQP}^{O} where the verifier makes polynomially many classical queries to an exponentially-long proof, and to the oracle OO. Our construction is inspired by the state synthesis algorithm of Grover and Rudolph, and serves as a complement to the "exponential PCP" constructed by Aharonov, Arad, and Vidick, which achieves similar parameters but which is based on different ideas and does not relativize. We propose relativization as a proxy for prover efficiency, and hope that progress towards an IP\mathsf{IP} for BQP\mathsf{BQP} in the oracle world will lead to a non-cryptographic interactive protocol for proving any quantum computation to a classical skeptic in the unrelativized world, which is a longstanding open problem in quantum complexity theory.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.11952,
  title  = {A Relativizing MIP for BQP},
  author = {Scott Aaronson and Anand Natarajan and Avishay Tal and Agi Villanyi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11952},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

19 pages, 4 figures

R2 v1 2026-07-01T12:07:26.222Z