The Acrobatics of BQP
Abstract
One can fix the randomness used by a randomized algorithm, but there is no analogous notion of fixing the quantumness used by a quantum algorithm. Underscoring this fundamental difference, we show that, in the black-box setting, the behavior of quantum polynomial-time () can be remarkably decoupled from that of classical complexity classes like . Specifically: -There exists an oracle relative to which , resolving a 2005 problem of Fortnow. As a corollary, there exists an oracle relative to which but . -Conversely, there exists an oracle relative to which . -Relative to a random oracle, is not contained in the " hierarchy" . -Relative to a random oracle, for every . -There exists an oracle relative to which and yet is infinite. -There exists an oracle relative to which . To achieve these results, we build on the 2018 achievement by Raz and Tal of an oracle relative to which , and associated results about the Forrelation problem. We also introduce new tools that might be of independent interest. These include a "quantum-aware" version of the random restriction method, a concentration theorem for the block sensitivity of circuits, and a (provable) analogue of the Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture for sparse oracles.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2111.10409,
title = {The Acrobatics of BQP},
author = {Scott Aaronson and DeVon Ingram and William Kretschmer},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10409},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
64 pages. V2: various writing improvements. V3: minor fixes to spelling and references. V4: corrected an error in what is now Lemma 53