English

Space-bounded quantum interactive proof systems

Quantum Physics 2025-07-30 v3 Computational Complexity

Abstract

We introduce two models of space-bounded quantum interactive proof systems, QIPL{\sf QIPL} and QIPUL{\sf QIP_{\rm U}L}. The QIPUL{\sf QIP_{\rm U}L} model, a space-bounded variant of quantum interactive proofs (QIP{\sf QIP}) introduced by Watrous (CC 2003) and Kitaev and Watrous (STOC 2000), restricts verifier actions to unitary circuits. In contrast, QIPL{\sf QIPL} allows logarithmically many pinching intermediate measurements per verifier action, making it the weakest model that encompasses the classical model of Condon and Ladner (JCSS 1995). We characterize the computational power of QIPL{\sf QIPL} and QIPUL{\sf QIP_{\rm U}L}. When the message number mm is polynomially bounded, QIPULQIPL{\sf QIP_{\rm U}L} \subsetneq {\sf QIPL} unless P=NP{\sf P} = {\sf NP}: - QIPLHC{\sf QIPL}^{\rm HC}, a subclass of QIPL{\sf QIPL} defined by a high-concentration condition on yes instances, exactly characterizes NP{\sf NP}. - QIPUL{\sf QIP_{\rm U}L} is contained in P{\sf P} and contains SAC1BQL{\sf SAC}^1 \cup {\sf BQL}, where SAC1{\sf SAC}^1 denotes problems solvable by classical logarithmic-depth, semi-unbounded fan-in circuits. However, this distinction vanishes when mm is constant. Our results further indicate that (pinching) intermediate measurements uniquely impact space-bounded quantum interactive proofs, unlike in space-bounded quantum computation, where BQL=BQUL{\sf BQL}={\sf BQ_{\rm U}L}. We also introduce space-bounded unitary quantum statistical zero-knowledge (QSZKUL{\sf QSZK_{\rm U}L}), a specific form of QIPUL{\sf QIP_{\rm U}L} proof systems with statistical zero-knowledge against any verifier. This class is a space-bounded variant of quantum statistical zero-knowledge (QSZK{\sf QSZK}) defined by Watrous (SICOMP 2009). We prove that QSZKUL=BQL{\sf QSZK_{\rm U}L} = {\sf BQL}, implying that the statistical zero-knowledge property negates the computational advantage typically gained from the interaction.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2410.23958,
  title  = {Space-bounded quantum interactive proof systems},
  author = {François Le Gall and Yupan Liu and Harumichi Nishimura and Qisheng Wang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.23958},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

53 pages, 4 figures. v3: The upper bounding techniques apply only to QIPL with a high-concentration condition on yes instances, due to a gap in the previous proof claiming QIPL is in AM. Minor changes otherwise