Related papers: Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

We reply to the comment cond-mat/0008098 by Yang, Sun, and Chang on our paper "Theory of Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ferromagnetism", Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5628 (2000).

This is a comment on the paper arXiv:1410.2840 by Ji and Jin, to appear in the AOAS.

We respond to comments in arXiv:2502.15817v2 about our article, arXiv:2412.12282. We stand by our conclusions and defend them against the criticisms.

This is a corrigendum to Acta Math. 196 (2006) as well as to the follow-up publications JFA 259 (2010) and to JFA 260 (2011).

This note gives an informal overview of the proof in our paper "Borel Conjecture and Dual Borel Conjecture", see arXiv:1105.0823.

It is shown that the arguments in the reply of Z.-D. Zhang (arXiv:0812.0194) to the comment arXiv:0811.1802 defending his conjectures in arXiv:0705.1045 are invalid. His conjectures have been thoroughly disproved.

Samuely et al. (cond-mat/0503153) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our…

Rejoinder to ``Support Vector Machines with Applications'' [math.ST/0612817]

This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]

We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.

There are some points in the reply of Horton et al. [http://stacks.iop.org/JPhysA/35/7963] to my comment [quant-ph/0202140] on their paper [quant-ph/0103114] which I cannot let stand without a response. I provide here some clarification of…

Rejoinder: Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]

Comment on ``Understanding OR, PS and DR'' [arXiv:0804.2958]

We answer a question of Zadrozny.

Corrections are brought to an article of Friesen on continued fractions of a given period.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

The inconsistency of cond-mat/0007299 and Phys. Rev. B 63 094510 (2001) with ARPES and resistivity data is pointed-out.

Comment on "The Need for Syncretism in Applied Statistics" [arXiv:1012.1161]

This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].

I comment on some theoretical work presented at QCD Moriond 2006.