Related papers: Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment
Reply to Comment quant-ph/0506207 by J.G.Brankov et al.
We review principal results on axiomatizability of classes of lattices of equivalences
We comment on the paper "Teleportation with a uniformly accelerated partner" (quant-ph/0302179).
In this note, the correction to the proof of one theorem in some our previous paper [arXiv:1302.0589] will be given.
In this note I make some comments on the review MR2723767 (2011m:03064) appeared in Mathematical Reviews
We reply to the recent comment cond-mat/9810097 on our original Letter `Roughening Transition of Interfaces in Disordered Systems', Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1469 (1998).
After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…
This paper is a reply to "On Salum's Algorithm for X3SAT" (arXiv:2104.02886)
This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).
This is the Reply to the Comment by E. Thuneberg refuting the paper by E. B.Sonin [Phys. Rev. B 104, 094517 (2021)] as incorrect. The criticism is based on a misunderstanding of the goal and the approach of the paper and does not provide…
Remarks on mathematical proof and the practice of mathematics.
It's a bit tedious, but as John Doe and Jean Roe have insisted on offering further comments on our comprehensive refutation of the former's already tiringly obstinate advances, we feel compelled to review their not even wrong opinions once…
We improve on Gonek-Montgomery's quantitative version of Kronecker's approximation theorem.
Reply to arXiv:1903.09201.
A response to criticism of the author's previous paper quant-ph/0002084.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
Comment on "Indispensable Finite Time Correlations for Fokker-Planck Equations from Time Series Data"
In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.
Letter/comment on M. Rini, Physics $\textbf{13}$, s94 (July 27, 2020) and A. Sanna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{125}$, 057001 (2020).
Benenti et al. recently submitted a Comment (arXiv:0912.3667) on our work "Coherent Ratchets in Driven Bose-Einstein condensates". We show that the main claim of the Comment is wrong, and correct some other misunderstandings presented…