Related papers: Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

This is a Reply on the proceeding comment on our paper titled "Classical Simulations Including Electron Correlations for Sequential Double Ionization".

We respond to comments on our paper, titled "Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio."

The paper presents a counterexample to the Hodge conjecture.

Two objections have been raised to the arguments presented in O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 80 (1999). It is pointed out that neither objection has anything whatsoever to do with the main subject matter of that paper, and shown that both…

We reply to the comment [arXiv:0903.5110] on our paper "Mechanism of Terahertz Electromagnetic Emission from Intrinsic Josephson Junctions" [arXiv:0810.5268].

We respond to the criticism raised in the paper arXiv:1704.07831.

In this article we continue to study $\aleph_0$-injectivity.

Comment on Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]

Comment on Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]

In their reply arXiv:1408.2230, the authors corrected some inappropriate sentences and clarified misleading descriptions in their original manuscript arXiv:1407.5194v1.

This is our formal Reply to revised version (v2) of arXiv: nucl-th/0510004v2.

Remarks on the Obstructedness of Cones Over Curves of Low Genus. Reason for replacement: proof of the main lemma was significantly improved.

Comment on 'Path Summation Formulation of the Master Equation'

A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.

We present a formulation of the Collatz conjecture that is potentially more amenable to modeling and analysis by automated termination checking tools.

The various versions of cond-mat/0312353 discuss results obtained by me&coworkers in the last decade. I have received requests to comment on the paper and the comments are collected here, including some that I tried to point in the course…

A recent Comment [arXiv:0811.2790] on the Letter 'Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall' by the authors is shown to arise from an incorrect understanding of the issues at hand and of our analysis. The conclusions of Bojowald's Comment are shown…

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

I refute the criticisms of hep-ph/0311241 raised in hep-ph/0312151.