Related papers: Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

New cases of the multiplicity conjecture are considered.

We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

This is a response to the commentaries on "CoRR: A Computing Research Repository".

This is a critique of cond-mat/9709195 . This paper is being submitted at this time for archiving purposes.

This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.

This is a Comment to the recent 3 papers by S.S. Afonin

This document contains a description of several of my papers, including remarks on history and connection with subsequent work. It also contains some new results and conjectures.

Comment on Causal Inference in the Medical Area [math.ST/0612783]

The authors discuss various objections and rejoinders in the collected responses [math.HO/9404229,math.HO/9404236] to their original article on the relationship between mathematics and theoretical physics [math.HO/9307227].

comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289

Some notes and observations on analytic functions defined on an annulus

An argument is provided for the equality case of the high dimensional Bonnesen inequality for sections. The known equality case of the Bonnesen inequality for projections is presented as a consequence.

Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

Comment: Bayesian Checking of the Second Levels of Hierarchical Models [arXiv:0802.0743]

Comment on "Biases in the Quasar Mass-Luminosity Plane"

The above hep-th posting purports -- erroneously -- to be a comment on a Note by me in gr-qc.

I provide some comments on Arithmetic Teichmuller Spaces constructed in my paper arXiv:2106.11452.

This is our response to the comment arXiv:2504.13683 posted by Chat\'e and Solon in reference to our preprint arXiv:2503.17064

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]