Related papers: Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

Brief response to a Reply [arXiv:1005.2615] on our Comments [arXiv:1005.0838] on XENON100 recent results [arXiv:1005.0380].

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.

Comment on "Support Vector Machines with Applications" [math.ST/0612817]

Comment on "Support Vector Machines with Applications" [math.ST/0612817]

A comment on cond-mat/0210707, cond-mat/0208230, cond-mat/0207153, and cond-mat/0202140.

Comment on ``Support Vector Machines with Applications'' [math.ST/0612817]

We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

Comment on ``On Random Scan Gibbs Samplers'' [arXiv:0808.3852]

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

I reply to Professor Peter van Nieuwenhuizen in connection with hep-th/0408137

It is shown that the numerical data in cond-mat/0608362 are in very good agreement with the predictions of cond-mat/0601573.

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].

Reply to comment by Jain, Cond-mat 9409012 published in the Physical Review Letters, Number 73, 1052 (1994).

We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]