English

Upper Bounding Rainbow Connection Number by Forest Number

Combinatorics 2020-06-12 v1

Abstract

A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are colored the same, and the graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path between each pair of its vertices. The minimum number of colors needed to rainbow-connect a graph GG is the rainbow connection number of GG, denoted by rc(G)\text{rc}(G). A simple way to rainbow-connect a graph GG is to color the edges of a spanning tree with distinct colors and then re-use any of these colors to color the remaining edges of GG. This proves that rc(G)V(G)1\text{rc}(G) \le |V(G)|-1. We ask whether there is a stronger connection between tree-like structures and rainbow coloring than that is implied by the above trivial argument. For instance, is it possible to find an upper bound of t(G)1t(G) -1 for rc(G)\text{rc}(G), where t(G)t(G) is the number of vertices in the largest induced tree of GG? The answer turns out to be negative, as there are counter-examples that show that even ct(G)c\cdot t(G) is not an upper bound for rc(G))\text{rc}(G)) for any given constant cc. In this work we show that if we consider the forest number f(G)f(G), the number of vertices in a maximum induced forest of GG, instead of t(G)t(G), then surprisingly we do get an upper bound. More specifically, we prove that rc(G)f(G)+2\text{rc}(G) \leq f(G) + 2. Our result indicates a stronger connection between rainbow connection and tree-like structures than that was suggested by the simple spanning tree based upper bound.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2006.06551,
  title  = {Upper Bounding Rainbow Connection Number by Forest Number},
  author = {L. Sunil Chandran and Davis Issac and Juho Lauri and Erik Jan van Leeuwen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.06551},
  year   = {2020}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-23T16:14:35.940Z