English

The densities in diffuse and translucent molecular clouds: estimates from observations of C$_2$ and from 3-dimensional extinction maps

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2024-09-04 v2

Abstract

Newly-computed collisional rate coefficients for the excitation of C2_2 in collisions with H2_2, presented recently by Najar and Kalugina (2020), are significantly larger than the values adopted previously in models for the excitation of the C2_2 molecule, a widely used probe of the interstellar gas density. With these new rate coefficients, we have modeled the C2_2 rotational distributions inferred from visible and ultraviolet absorption observations of electronic transitions of C2_2 towards a collection of 46 nearby background sources. The inferred gas densities in the foreground interstellar clouds responsible for the observed C2_2 absorption are a factor 4 to 7 smaller than those inferred previously, a direct reflection of the larger collisional rate coefficients computed by Najar and Kalugina (2020). These lower density estimates are generally in good agreement with the peak densities inferred from 3D extinction maps for the relevant sightlines. In cases where H3+_3^+ absorption has also been observed and used to estimate the cosmic-ray ionization rate (CRIR), our estimates of the latter will also decrease accordingly because the H3+_3^+ abundance is a function of the ratio of the CRIR to the gas density.

Cite

@article{arxiv.2408.11108,
  title  = {The densities in diffuse and translucent molecular clouds: estimates from observations of C$_2$ and from 3-dimensional extinction maps},
  author = {David A. Neufeld and Daniel E. Welty and Alexei V. Ivlev and Paola Caselli and Gordian Edenhofer and Nick Indriolo and Marta Obolentseva and Kedron Silsbee and Paule Sonnentrucker and Mark G. Wolfire},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11108},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

46 pages, 11 figures, 1 figure set with 23 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. Version 2: An error is corrected in Table 2, in which values listed in two of the columns were jumbled in Version 1. There are no other changes