English

Re-evaluation of the cosmic-ray ionization rate in diffuse clouds

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2024-08-22 v1

Abstract

All current estimates of the cosmic-ray (CR) ionization rate rely on assessments of the gas density along the probed sight lines. Until now, these have been based on observations of different tracers, with C2_2 being the most widely used in diffuse molecular clouds for this purpose. However, three-dimensional dust extinction maps have recently reached sufficient accuracy as to give an independent measurement of the gas density on parsec scales. In addition, they allow us to identify the gas clumps along each sight line, thus localizing the regions where CR ionization is probed. We re-evaluate H3+_3^+ observations, which are often considered as the most reliable method to measure the H2_2 ionization rate ζH2\zeta_{\rm H_2} in diffuse clouds. The peak density values derived from the extinction maps for 12 analyzed sight lines turn out to be, on average, an order of magnitude lower than the previous estimates, and agree with the values obtained from revised analysis of C2_2 data. We use the extinction maps in combination with the 3D-PDR code to self-consistently compute the H3+_3^+ and H2_2 abundances in the identified clumps for different values of ζH2\zeta_{\rm H_2}. For each sight line, we obtain the optimum value by comparing the simulation results with observations. We show that ζH2\zeta_{\rm H_2} is systematically reduced with respect to the earlier estimates by a factor of 9\approx 9 on average, to 6×1017\approx6\times10^{-17} s1^{-1}, primarily as a result of the density reduction. We emphasize that these results have profound consequences for all available measurements of the ionization rate.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2408.11511,
  title  = {Re-evaluation of the cosmic-ray ionization rate in diffuse clouds},
  author = {M. Obolentseva and A. V. Ivlev and K. Silsbee and D. A. Neufeld and P. Caselli and G. Edenhofer and N. Indriolo and T. G. Bisbas and D. Lomeli},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11511},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in ApJ

R2 v1 2026-06-28T18:19:19.036Z