English

On non-feasible edge sets in matching-covered graphs

Combinatorics 2020-08-18 v1

Abstract

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a matching-covered graph and XX be an edge set of GG. XX is said to be feasible if there exist two perfect matchings M1M_1 and M2M_2 in GG such that M1X≢M2X (\mboxmod2)|M_1\cap X|\not \equiv|M_2\cap X|\ (\mbox{mod } 2). For any V0VV_0\subseteq V, XX is said to be switching-equivalent to XG(V0)X\oplus \nabla_G(V_0), where G(V0)\nabla_G(V_0) is the set of edges in GG each of which has exactly one end in V0V_0 and ABA \oplus B is the symmetric difference of two sets AA and BB. Lukot'ka and Rollov\'a showed that when GG is regular and bipartite, XX is non-feasible if and only if XX is switching-equivalent to \emptyset. This article extends Lukot'ka and Rollov\'a's result by showing that this conclusion holds as long as GG is matching-covered and bipartite. This article also studies matching-covered graphs GG whose non-feasible edge sets are switching-equivalent to \emptyset or EE and partially characterizes these matching-covered graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Another aim of this article is to construct infinite many rr-connected and rr-regular graphs of class 1 containing non-feasible edge sets not switching-equivalent to either \emptyset or EE for an arbitrary integer rr with r3r\ge 3, which provides negative answers to problems asked by Lukot'ka and Rollov\'a and He, et al respectively.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1812.06240,
  title  = {On non-feasible edge sets in matching-covered graphs},
  author = {Xiao Zhao and Fengming Dong and Sheng Chen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.06240},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

21 pages, 5 figures

R2 v1 2026-06-23T06:43:19.051Z