Is every knot isotopic to the unknot?
Abstract
In 1974, D. Rolfsen asked: Is every knot in isotopic (=homotopic through embeddings) to a PL knot or, equivalently, to the unknot? In particular, is the Bing sling isotopic to a PL knot? We show that the Bing sling is not isotopic to any PL knot: (1) by an isotopy which extends to an isotopy of -component links with ; (2) through knots that are intersections of nested sequences of solid tori. There are also stronger versions of these results. In (1), the additional component may be allowed to self-intersect, and even to get replaced by a new one as long as it represents the same conjugacy class in , where is the fundamental group of the complement to the original component. In (2), the "solid tori" can be replaced by "boundary-link-like handlebodies", where a handlebody of genus is called boundary-link-like if admits a homomorphism to the free group such that the composition is surjective.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2406.09365,
title = {Is every knot isotopic to the unknot?},
author = {Sergey A. Melikhov},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09365},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
61 pages, 12 figures