English

Inapproximability Results for Approximate Nash Equilibria

Computer Science and Game Theory 2017-04-26 v3

Abstract

We study the problem of finding approximate Nash equilibria that satisfy certain conditions, such as providing good social welfare. In particular, we study the problem ϵ\epsilon-NE δ\delta-SW: find an ϵ\epsilon-approximate Nash equilibrium (ϵ\epsilon-NE) that is within δ\delta of the best social welfare achievable by an ϵ\epsilon-NE. Our main result is that, if the exponential-time hypothesis (ETH) is true, then solving (18O(δ))\left(\frac{1}{8} - \mathrm{O}(\delta)\right)-NE O(δ)\mathrm{O}(\delta)-SW for an n×nn\times n bimatrix game requires nΩ~(logn)n^{\mathrm{\widetilde \Omega}(\log n)} time. Building on this result, we show similar conditional running time lower bounds on a number of decision problems for approximate Nash equilibria that do not involve social welfare, including maximizing or minimizing a certain player's payoff, or finding approximate equilibria contained in a given pair of supports. We show quasi-polynomial lower bounds for these problems assuming that ETH holds, where these lower bounds apply to ϵ\epsilon-Nash equilibria for all ϵ<18\epsilon < \frac{1}{8}. The hardness of these other decision problems has so far only been studied in the context of exact equilibria.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1608.03574,
  title  = {Inapproximability Results for Approximate Nash Equilibria},
  author = {Argyrios Deligkas and John Fearnley and Rahul Savani},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03574},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

A short (14-page) version of this paper appeared at WINE 2016. Compared to that conference version, this new version improves the conditional lower bounds, which now rely on ETH rather than RETH (Randomized ETH)

R2 v1 2026-06-22T15:17:55.380Z