相关论文: Remarks on Universal Quantum Computer

The paper was retracted.

This essay is a response to the (March 2000) Physics Today Opinion article "Quantum Theory Needs No Interpretation" by Fuchs and Peres. It was written several years ago and has been collecting electronic dust ever since Physics Today said…

Quantum computing exposes the brilliance of quantum mechanics through computer science and, as such, gives oneself a marvelous and exhilarating journey to go through. This article leads along that journey with a historical and current…

This paper has been withdrawn. The main technical result will reappear in the new version of quant-ph/0501003.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This is an "Essay-Review" of a book with the same title, by Jeffrey Bub (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

The above hep-th posting purports -- erroneously -- to be a comment on a Note by me in gr-qc.

This article gives an elementary introduction to quantum computing. It is a draft for a book chapter of the "Handbook of Nature-Inspired and Innovative Computing", Eds. A. Zomaya, G.J. Milburn, J. Dongarra, D. Bader, R. Brent, M.…

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

This paper has been withdrawn

This is a position paper written as an introduction to the special volume on quantum algorithms I edited for the journal Mathematical Structures in Computer Science (Volume 20 - Special Issue 06 (Quantum Algorithms), 2010).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, as it is now incorporated in 0901.4506 (v4)

The article is taken out for change of contents with immediate effect.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.

This paper has been removed.

This article has been replaced by arXiv:0807.3093

This paper is withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn: it does not evade the no-go results of Mayers, Lo and Chau, to whom I am most grateful for helpful correspondences.

The paper is taken out with immediate effect.