相关论文: Classical Physics revisited: Derivation and explan…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the data-analysis.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the paper is largely revised and improved.

This paper was withdrawn by the author. It turns out that similar ideas have been presented before. The author apologizes.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an erro thereon line -2 of page 4.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.

Unfortunately, after an imprudent sumbission of the paper to the e-print archive, I discovered in it many serious mistakes. So I draw back it .

This paper has been withdrawn, as all conjectures (and one claim) have been proven incorrect. Some of what remains may eventually reappear in a different context.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in eq.59. I apologize for the inconveniences.

Paper withdrawn due to errors. Revised version may or may not appear in the future.

The Born Rule plays a critical role in quantum mechanics (QM) since it supplies the link between the mathematical formalism and experimental results in terms of probabilities. The Born Rule does not occur in ordinary probability theory.…

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.

This paper has been withdrawn due to an error, and no further revisions will be made.

The paper is withdrawn by the author because it is superseded by cond-mat/0303357 .

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because Lemma 3 is incorrect. This mistake is crucial in this paper.

This paper has been withdrawn because of serious errors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error in Section 7.

This paper has been withdrawn due to submission of subsequent versions as a new preprint

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to extremely unscientific errors.

This paper has been withdrawn due to crucial erros in equations (24)--(31).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due an error in the proof of Proposion 2.13.