相关论文: Two-loop calculations for the propagators of gluon…
Errors in the published version of the paper are corrected, and new figures are provided.
Two typos in the published paper are pointed out. Both are just typos and the calculations in that paper are based on the correct formulism.
This is an erratum to our paper.
This erratum corrects the article arXiv:0806.2044 published in Ann. Probab. 36 (2008) 931--970
Recently, we discovered a mistake in our Letter on phase dynamics in granular d-wave superconductors, which we corrected in an Erratum published last week. This is an expanded version of the Erratum, containing details and supporting…
The original paper, as published in Nuclear Physics B in 1988, had a few factor-of-two errors. Some people got confused by those errors. The purpose of these errata is to make things clear. The revised version of the complete article is…
The equations in cond-mat/0011020 and Phys. Rev, Lett. 86, 4652 (2001) are valid but a numerical estimate in the paper is incorrect.
This is an erratum to our previously published paper.
This is an erratum to our paper in Physical Review D82:022004,2010, corresponding to preprint: arXiv:1003.2961 .
This is erratum of the paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4260 (2000)]
An error in the paper [J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002); math-ph/0207009] is corrected. Further explanation is given.
An error in the calculation of the Coulomb coupling parameter of the quark-gluon plasma is corrected.
This erratum aims to correct 1) the wrong expressions, 2) some typographical errors, 3) some erroneous points made in discussion of the disparity of heat flux ratios between our full RPA model and the local conductivity model, and 4) the…
We provide updated predictions for elastic \gamma ${}^3$He cross sections and asymmetries that correct erroneous results we published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 232303 (2007) and Nucl. Phys. A 819, 98 (2009).
We correct a simple error in Percolation on random Johnson-Mehl tessellations and related models, Probability Theory and Related Fields 140 (2008), 417-468. (See also arXiv:math/0610716)
The implications of a numerical error in the photon production rate on the direct photon spectrum of a chemically non-equilibrated quark-gluon plasma are discussed.
We correct several errors in Phys. Rev. D 66, 094011 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0205210].
A significant mathematical error is identified and corrected in a recent highly-cited paper on oscillatory flows of second-grade fluids [Fetecau & Fetecau (2005). Int. J. Eng. Sci., 43, 781--789]. The corrected solutions are shown to agree…
The formulas in the above Erratum are corrected.
Erratum to the article: Charge transfer to solvent identified using dark channel fluorescence-yield L-edge spectroscopy, NATURE CHEMISTRY 2 (2010) 853