相关论文: Reply to Comment on "Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of…

As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.

Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).

This is a comment on "How to Observe Coherent Electron Dynamics Directly" [H. J. Suominen and A. Kirrander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043002 (2014)].

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

This is a reply to the comment by Gilbert and Sanders [arXiv:1111.6271 (2011)]. We point out that their comment is a follow-up of a previous discussion which we briefly summarize before we refute their new criticism.

We reply to the Comment by Singha and Barma on our Letter "Replica symmetry breaking in trajectories of a driven Brownian particle".

A comment on ``Metallization of Fluid Nitrogen and the Mott Transition in Highly Compressed Low-Z Fluids'' by Chau et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 245501 (2003).

Reply to the Comment on "Unified Formulism of Andreev Reflection at a Ferromagnetic/Superconductor Interface" by Eschrig et al

We analyze the invariant mass spectrum of Lambda-Lambda in $^{12}C(K^-,K^+ Lambda Lambda)$ reaction at P(K^+)=1.65 GeV/c by using a combined framework of IntraNuclear Cascade (INC) model and the correlation function technique. The observed…

We reply to the comments on our paper "Quantum Confinement in Hydrogen Bond" (Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115 (2015) 765 DOI: 10.1002/qua.24894) made by Matthias Heger and Martin A. Suhm.

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

In this note we confront the research conducted in \cite{Hoang:2017suc} with results previously obtained by the author, and critically examine some of their claimed findings.

Benenti et al. recently submitted a Comment (arXiv:0912.3667) on our work "Coherent Ratchets in Driven Bose-Einstein condensates". We show that the main claim of the Comment is wrong, and correct some other misunderstandings presented…

We studied carefully the comment by S. G. Karshenboim, V. G. Ivanov and J. Chluba to our paper "Two-photon approximation in the theory of the electron recombination in hydrogen" and found this comment erroneous.

A Comment on the Letter by D. Hemanth Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 144301 (2004)

A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]

Reply to the Comment of Luo, Xiang, and Wang, cond-mat/0212580.

Reply to the Comment of J.J. Alonso and J.F. Fernandez on the paper "'Hole-digging' in ensembles of tunneling molecular magnets" of I.S. Tupitsyn, P.C.E. Stamp and N.V. Prokof'ev (Phys. Rev. B 69, 132406, (2004)).

We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However,…

E.V. Kozik and B.V. Svistunov (KS) paper "Symmetries and Interaction Coefficients of Kelvin waves", arXiv:1006.1789v1, [cond-mat.other] 9 Jun 2010, contains a comment on paper "Symmetries and Interaction coefficients of Kelvin waves", V. V.…