相关论文: Comment on ``Once more about the $\kk$ molecule ap…

In this manuscript we comment on the criticism raised recently by Achasov and Kiselev [Phys. Rev. D 76, 077501 (2007)] on our work on the radiative decays phi to gamma a_0/f_0 [Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 437 (2005)]. Specifically, we demonstrate…

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

We refute criticisms by Del Santo and Horvat towards our paper "Quantum principle of relativity": most of their counterarguments can be dismissed, and the rest provides further evidence to our claims.

In this manuscript the authors present a detailed answer to the comment in order to avoid misunderstandings in the future.

In a recent preprint, arXiv 2005.03716v1, G. Wegner and C. Henkel criticized my work on the possibility of lossless surface plasma waves. Here I refute all of their criticisms.

We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]

Shukla and Akbari-Moghanjoughi have {\it corrected} their Comment (see their version 1 on `arXiv:1207.7029v1) to EPL on our work [1] after receiving our Response from the Editors of EPL. We have a pleasant duty at hand to present our second…

This is a short communication in reference to the comments in (arXiv: 1605.05147) of our paper in Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1650051 (2016). We have tried to answer to the comments or criticism in the paper.

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

We respond to N. Szpak's comment [arXiv:0907.5146v2] on our paper "Late-time tails of a self-gravitating massless scalar field, revisited", Class. Quantum Grav. 26, 175006 (2009). [arXiv:0812.4333]

We reply to the criticisms of our publication (N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, and Y. Tanimura, Phys. Lett. B808, 135693 (2020)) made by A. Ono in his recent article, arXiv:2201.02966.

We respond to recent works by Bradshaw and Andrews on the discriminatory optical force for chiral molecules, in particular to the erroneous claims made by them concerning our earlier work.

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

Few days ago V.D. Efros submitted a preprint to nucl-th containing criticisms of our recent research activity on bound and scattering states of A=3, 4 nucleons. As a consequence, we are forced to examine the essence of the controversy and…

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.

We make comments on Gaidarzhy {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 94, 030402 (2005)] letter.

We refute the criticisms of our work on strong-coupling in the presence of an incoherent pumping.