相关论文: Reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarm…

Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

I show that the conclusions of [Hwang, Chavez, Amann, & Boccaletti, PRL 94, 138701 (2005); Chavez, Hwang, Amann, Hentschel, & Boccaletti, PRL 94, 218701 (2005)] are closely related to those of previous publications.

We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

This is a reply to a comment of Casati, Chirikov and Zhirov (PRL 85, 896 (2000)) on PRL 83, 5419 (1999). The suitability of the particlar two-time boundary value problem used in the earlier PRL is argued.

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…

We reply to the comment cond-mat/0008098 by Yang, Sun, and Chang on our paper "Theory of Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ferromagnetism", Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5628 (2000).

We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].

Reply to comment by Jain, Cond-mat 9409012 published in the Physical Review Letters, Number 73, 1052 (1994).

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026