相关论文: Reply to comments by D.H.E. Gross
A reply to the comment by Lee et al. [arXiv:1309.5367]
This note replies Dr. Jensen (2010) comments on Problem 2.3, which was left in Fuh (2010). In the following, we use the same notations and definitions in Fuh (2006) unless specified.
Short introduction to the gauge/gravity duality
The aim of this note is to establish an interesting hypergeometric generating relation contiguous to that of Exton by a short method.
A critical review is presented on the most recent attempt to generally explain the notion of "statistical symmetry". This particular explanation, however, is incomplete and misses one important and essential aspect. The aim of this short…
The reply is no more necessary since the comment was already withdrawn
We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].
Reinhard Werner authored a comment on my paper "What Bell Did", disputing the conclusion and argumentation of the paper. This is my reply.
Reply to Comment on 'Length Scale Dependence of DNA Mechanical Properties'
As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.
Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A. S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582]
The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…
In this short note, we answer two questions of Chen and Ruzsa negatively and answer a problem of Ma and Chen affirmatively.
In our comment we show that some of the very difficult problems have been successfully solved. We have to focus on the resolved problems, since the authors claims: Our hope, however, is that the topics we have presented will provide…
A simple proof of the higher Capelli identities is given.
The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0802.2019
In this note, we combine ideas of several previous proofs in order to obtain a quite short proof of Gr\"otzsch theorem.
A conjecture regarding the structure of expander graphs is discussed.
A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.
In this short note we provide clarification to the comments made in Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2018) 69:64 on our work "Finiteness of corner vortices" [ Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2018) 69:37].