相关论文: Reply to a Comment
Comment on "Support Vector Machines with Applications" [math.ST/0612817]
Answer to the comment of E. Chudnovsky concerning the following papers: (1) N.V. Prokof'ev, P.C.E. Stamp, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5794 (1998). (2) W. Wernsdorfer, T. Ohm, C. Sangregorio, R. Sessoli, D. Mailly, C. Paulsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82,…
A brief comment on the paper hep-th/0508051 (with the title mentioned above) by F. Nasseri.
We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].
This is the reply to a Comment by Alava and Zapperi (cond-mat/0401568) on Schmittbuhl, Hansen and Batrouni, PRL, 90, 045505 (2003).
Rejoinder to "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" by J. J. Goeman, A. Solari [arXiv:1208.2841].
Comment on ``Understanding OR, PS and DR'' [arXiv:0804.2958]
This is the final remark on the replies received to my target paper in the Italian Journal of Linguistics
A number of misleading or incorrect comments by C.Giunti on seven arXiv preprints that I have written on the theory of neutrino oscillations are discussed. The essential new features of my approach are also briefly reviewed
Comment on ``Support Vector Machines with Applications'' [math.ST/0612817]
The authors discuss various objections and rejoinders in the collected responses [math.HO/9404229,math.HO/9404236] to their original article on the relationship between mathematics and theoretical physics [math.HO/9307227].
We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)
In this note we answer the two questions raised by Y.Y Li and L. Nguyen in their note [LN2] below.
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
Comment on "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability Revisited" [arXiv:0804.3173]
We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1501.06996 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.) on our Letter A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…
The various versions of cond-mat/0312353 discuss results obtained by me&coworkers in the last decade. I have received requests to comment on the paper and the comments are collected here, including some that I tried to point in the course…
We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However,…