相关论文: Comment on "Two Fermi points in the exact solution…

In a comment by A.A. Zvyagin the phase diagram in our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 516 (2001)] was critisized of being incomplete and a new fixed point was suggested. We show that this point is in fact not a fixed point and that the phase…

Comment on the Letter by M. Franz and Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.87, p.257003 (2001).

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

A reply to the comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 279701 (2011), arXiv:1206.5372] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

This is the reply to a Comment by R. F. O'Connell (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 028901) on a paper written by the author (B. Vacchini, ``Completely positive quantum dissipation'', Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 1374, arXiv:quant-ph/0002094).

This is a Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 95}, 187404 (2005)

A revised version of the last appendix of the (previous) paper "Existence and Regularity for an Energy Maximization Problem in Two Dimensions" by S.Kamvissis and E.A.Rakhmanov, that appeared in the Journal of Mathematical Physics, v.46,…

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

A Comment on the Letter by S. Zelakiewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1942 (2000).

Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].

A Comment on the paper "Conservative Quantum Computing" by M. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057902 (2002). The author replies in Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 089802 (2003).

Erroneous statements on the mathematical and physical properties of the double-Kerr solution made in a recent paper (Class. Quantum Grav. 21 (2004) 2723) are commented.

We make corrections on the paper by Sugino [{\it JHEP} {\bf 0501} (2005) 016].

Certain comments on the paper of Yu.V. Orlov, B. F. Irgaziev and L. I. Nikitina published in Phys.At.Nuclei, {\bf 73} (2010) 757 are made.

Comment on: L.F. Cugliandolo and J.L. Iguain; Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85} 3448 (2000)

Reply to comment by Zhou et al. (arXiv:1012.3602) on arXiv:1012.1484 / Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 127005 (2011).

A Comment on the Letter by E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230502 (2005).

We show that the numerical method [M.E. Torio, K. Hallberg, A.H. Ceccatto, and C.R. Proetto, Phys. Rev. B 65, 085302 (2002), cond-mat/0108167v2] does not reproduce correctly the Kondo physics in quantum dot systems with interaction.

We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].