相关论文: Comment on "Origin of Giant Optical Nonlinearity i…

We reply to a recent comment by Bhattacharya et. al. (cond-mat/9812290) on our previous Letter (PRL 81, 5640 (1998)).

Comment on X.-L. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253602 (2010).

Comment on "Scalings of Rayleigh-Taylor Instability at Large Viscosity Contrasts in Porous Media" (N. Sabet, H. Hassanzadeh, A. De Wit, and J. Abedi (2021) Phys. Rev. Lett. 126:094501).

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

A comment on the paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 161116 (2014).

comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289

Reply to the Comment [arXiv:1609.04476] on a recent work in PRL [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

The cited article contains a serious flaw. A remedy is found in articles by other authors.

As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)

We reply to the recent comment cond-mat/9809184 on our original paper `Non-universal exponents in interface growth', Phys. Rev. Lett, 79, 2261 (1997).

We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

This is a reply to the Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips' [arXiv:quant-ph/0610095 (2006)].

A comment to the paper by S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087205 (2001)].

This is a comment on "Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems", by Bramwell et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3744 (2000.

Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).

A Comment on the Letter by Granger et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135506 (2002).

In this comment, I point out to several mathematical mistakes in the above-referenced letter.

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).