相关论文: Comment on 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neuman…

We point out that the main theorem of Ref2 := [Adv. Math. 407, Article ID 108564, 22 p. (2022)] is included in the prior research survey Ref1 := [Expo. Math., 40(2), 265-301, 2022]. For context, we also reproduce the rather simple proof…

The notice provides some critical remarks on a paper (preprint) by V.A.Sharafutdinov. The remarks mainly concern Theorem 1.1 on determination of the Riemann surface from its Dirichlet-to-Neuman map, which is declared as one of the basic…

In the article "Universal Densities Exist for Every Finite Reference Measure" (IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 5277--5288, 2023) we neglected to mention relevant contributions of Boris Ryabko. We cited a source by him that…

The comment gives principal arguments proving that the claims given in the title of the commented paper and some its conclusions have to be wrong for principal reasons. An example illustrating the arguments is provided via atomistic…

This is the original version of my Ph.D. thesis. The main results have been divided up between papers arXiv:2111.09784 and arXiv:2204.10924. This paper has been kept on the arXiv to preserve some proofs of elementary lemmas that will be…

We provide a reply to a comment by I. Goychuk arXiv:1501.06996 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (not under active consideration with Phys. Rev. Lett.) on our Letter A. Rebenshtok, S. Denisov, P. H\"anggi, and E. Barkai, {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf…

We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.

In this paper, we collect basic properties of the Albanese dimension and explain how to generalize the main theorem of [F2](math.AG/0204262). This paper is a supplement and a generalization of [F2]. We also prove an inequality of…

This note is a corrigendum to the previous version arXiv:0711.2735v3 published in J. Lie Theory. As it has been recently pointed out to me by Alexander Premet, Remark 3 of arXiv:0711.2735v3 is incorrect. We verify in this note thanks to…

A recent paper of Chen et al. claims to have derived an allegedly previously unavailable "unified" Andreev Reflection (AR) formalism for an arbitrary spin polarization P that recovers earlier results as its special limits. In this Comment…

We comment on a priority claim given by the authors of Phys.Rev.C91 (2015) 6, 064311.

A comment to the authors' SRF Conference pre-print [1] was submitted by A. Gurevich to the arXiv [2]. In this response, we show that the arguments used in the comment are not valid. [1] arXiv:1309.3239 [2] arXiv:1309.5626

In this note we fill a gap in the proof of the main theorem (Theorem 1.2) of our paper 'Surfaces in 4-manifolds', Math. Res. Letters 4 (1997), 907-914.

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

The experimental findings reported in our original paper [1] (arXiv:1211.2913) have been criticized in ref.[2] (arXiv:1606.00710). We believe that the arguments brought in ref. [2] are not correct and we show evidence for this.

We compare the results of our two papers with the results of the paper Aratyn H., Gomes J.F., Zimerman A.H., Higher order Painlev\'e equations and their symmetries via reductions of a class of integrable models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., V.…

A Comment by R. Blumenfeld on our recent analytical solution for the random close packing density [A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 028002 (2022)] is shown to be plagued by important errors and to contain incorrect statements.

We discuss the claims of the comment at arXiv.org:physics/0609234. We show that A.V. Kildishev et al. misread our method of extracting of optical constants of nanostructured films. The theoretical calculations performed in the comment…

Our paper [Phys. Rev. A 93, 052512 (2016)], proposing a novel form of single determinant wave function that admits non-idempotent 1-electron density matrices, has recently received a Comment [Phys. Rev. A ??, 0????? (2017)] suggesting a…

There is a gap in Theorem 2.2 of the paper of Du (\cite{D_2010}). In this paper, we shall state the gap and repair it.