相关论文: Comment on "Neutron Lifetime and Axial Coupling Co…
This is a Comment on the Article ``Aging, phase ordering and conformal invariance'' by M.Henkel, M.Pleimling, C.Godr\`eche and J.M.Luck [Phys.Rev.Lett. 87, 265701 (2001)].
Comment on P. Walker, Nature 453 (2008) 864, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/full/453864a.html
The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0902.1502
We comment on a recent manuscript by A. P. Serebrov, et al. regarding residual gas charge exchange in the beam neutron lifetime experiment
Here is response Neutrino-4 collaboration to the note arXiv:2006.13147 on article "Preparation of the Neutrino-4 experiment on search for sterile neutrino and the obtained results of measurements" arXiv:2005.05301. Red text is commentary…
We comment on the paper hep-ph/9701265.
This is a Reply to the Comment posted as arXiv:1207.1261.
Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]
Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]
This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].
I comment on a recent preprint "Neutrino Velocity Anomalies: A Resolution without a Revolution" that appeared recently as arXiv:1110.0989 [hep-ph]
We present comments on the paper "Observation of Long-Range, Near-Side Angular Correlations in proton-proton Collisions at the LHC".
Comment on "Classical Simulations Including Electron Correlations for Sequential Double Ionization" [arXiv:1204.3956]
As a coauthor of the article mentioned in the title, I discuss the criticism in the comment of Aalseth et al. Part of the criticism is justified.
We comment on a Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 080605 (2015), arXiv:1411.1816] "Replica symmetry breaking in trajectories of a driven Brownian particle" and author reply [arXiv:1805.10474]
Comment on Proximity breakdown of hydrides in superconducting niobium cavities [arXiv:1212.3384].
A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]
This is an addendum to the Reply Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139602 (2009), arXiv:0811.0518] to Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601 (2009), arXiv:0810.4791] on Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008), arXiv:0804.1898].
This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).
Experimental studies of neutron decay, $n\to pe\bar\nu$, exhibit two anomalies. The first is a 8.6(2.1)s, roughly $4\sigma$ difference between the average beam measured neutron lifetime, $\tau_n^\text{beam}=888.0(2.0)$s, and the more…