相关论文: Comment on "Superhard Semiconducting Optically Tra…

The comment of Dubrovinskaia et al. is scientifically flawed. The high-pressure form of boron, discovered by Oganov et al., is indeed new and its bonding has a significant ionic character, as demonstrated in Ref. 1.

Comment on the Letter by M. Franz and Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.87, p.257003 (2001).

Comment to D. Kaczorowski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 027003 (2009).

Comment on "High Resolution Polar Effect Measurements of Sr2RuO4: Evidence for Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry in the Superconducting State" by J. Xia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167002 (2006).

First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on…

The authors of preprint arXiv:2009.00286 and paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 130501 (2020), Y. Sivan and Y. Dubi, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on our papers [J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 16616-16631 (2013), ACS Photonics 4 (11),…

We comment on the paper hep-ph/9701265.

Errata are given for J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, Nucl. Phys. B272 (1986) 1, Nucl. Phys. B278 (1986) 449, and Nucl. Phys. B307 (1988) 445.

A comment on a recent paper (PRL {\bf 94}, 226405 (2005)) by S. De Palo, M. Botti, S. Moroni, and Gaetano Senatore.

Claims by Kroha and Zawadowski in cond-mat/0105026 on inadequate approximations and an incorrect statement in cond-mat/0102150 are shown to be based on oversimplified estimates and a false quotation.

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

Recently, Bafekry et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 130, 114301(2021)] reported their density functional theory (DFT) results on the structural, phonon dispersion, elastic constants and electronic properties of a BCN monolayer. The aforementioned…

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).

In relation to our original paper [M. Droth et al., Phys. Rev. B 94, 075404 (2016)], the Comment by Li et al. [Phys. Rev. B 98, 167403 (2018)] claims to have identified a "mistake in constructing the adiabatic process of the…

We comment on a recent article published in Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) no.9, 094513, arXiv:1811.09029, pointing out severe problems in the numerical investigation leading to questionable results and misleading conclusions during their…

In this comment we wish to clarify and correct some of the statements made in a recent paper by E. G. Mishchenko (Europhys. Lett. 83 (2008) 17005).

In hep-ph/0404212 Diakonov, Petrov, and Polyakov respond to my recent comments on their 1997 paper, ``Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons: prediction from chiral solitons''. Their responses do not address the basic issues or alter the…

We demonstrate that criticisms concerning our work nucl-th/9704043, made in the recent preprint hep-ph/9903352, are unfounded. The improvements over our results claimed in hep-ph/9903352 are in fact spurious, being based mainly on…

This paper contains our comments on the work of the authors A. I. Ahmadov \textit{et al.} "Single meson production in photon-photon collisions and infrared renormalons" [arXiv:0911.5226v1 27 Nov 2009]. We draw attention to errors made in…

The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…