相关论文: Comment on Andr\'e Martin: "Can one improve the Fr…

Reply to ``Comment on [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 630 (1998)]''

A Comment on the Letter by Victor Gurarie and Alexander E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 178301 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Reply to the Comment on "Unified Formulism of Andreev Reflection at a Ferromagnetic/Superconductor Interface" by Eschrig et al

comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289

This is a comment on M. Stern, V. Garmider, E. Segre, M. Rappaport, V. Umansky, Y. Levinson, and I. Bar-Joseph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 257402 (2008).

This paper agrees basically with the talk of the author at the workshop "Homological Mirror Symmetry and Applications", Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, March 2007.

I review some of the main results on hard diffraction, in their relation to QCD, and indicate some of the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments. I also make some suggestions for future work.

This is a supplementary material to our Comment arXiv:0909.4265 on M. Stern, V. Garmider, E. Segre, M. Rappaport, V. Umansky, Y. Levinson, and I. Bar-Joseph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 257402 (2008).

This is a comment on the paper : Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers by Deng et al, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

The various versions of cond-mat/0312353 discuss results obtained by me&coworkers in the last decade. I have received requests to comment on the paper and the comments are collected here, including some that I tried to point in the course…

We clarify the basic faults in Fang, A.; Mi, Y. Drainage of a Thin Liquid Film between Hydrophobic Spheres: Boundary Curvature Effects. Langmuir 2014, 30, 83-89, which led to unphysical conclusions.

Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)