相关论文: A review of redshift and its interpretation in cos…

Harrison's argument against the interpretation of the cosmological redshift as a Doppler effect is revisited, exaggerated, and discussed. The context, purpose, and limitations of the interpretations of this phenomenon are clarified.

This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv admins because it contains inappropriate overlap with arXiv:physics/0603087.

This paper has been withdrawn because the models on which it was based have undergone significant changes and improvements. A new paper with the same title, based on the improved models, is accepted for publication in MNRAS and is available…

This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.

From the first observations made by Slipher, our understanding and interpretation of the cosmological redshift was evolving until reaching the current consensus, through the expanding universe and the emergence of modern physical cosmology…

The cosmological redshifts z in the frequencies of spectral lines from distant galaxies as compared with their values observed in terrestrial laboratories, which are due to the scale factor a(t), frequently are interpret as a…

This paper was withdrawn by arXiv admins because of inappropriate and unverifiable claims of appropriation.

This paper gives a compilation of physical mechanisms which have been proposed to explain the spectral red-shift of distant astronomical objects. Over sixty selected mechanisms are listed for the purpose of quantitative comparisons. Some of…

Recently [arXiv:astro-ph/0612155] we presented a formal mathematical proof that, contrary to a widespread misconception, cosmological expansion cannot be understood as the motion of galaxies in non-expanding space. We showed that the…

arXiv admin note: This submission has been removed by arXiv administrators due to unprofessional personal attack.

This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it plagiarizes gr-qc/9910015, gr-qc/0008034, and hep-th/0308070. This paper also has excessive overlap with the following papers also written by the authors or their collaborators:…

This paper has been removed by arXiv admin because it was an erroneous duplicate of astro-ph/9411031.

A modified version of this paper is under process and with a new title and abstract. Hence, this version of the article is completely withdrawn.

In this letter, the old issue of whether redshifts of quasars are of cosmological origin is investigated. We make a plot of absorption redshifts versus emission redshifts for quasars with large amounts of data. Our study shows that, almost…

This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it plagiarizes gr-qc/0404032 and others.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because overcame by arXiv:0910.4694

This paper has been removed by arXiv administrators because it overlaps hep-th/0308070, and others. This paper also has excessive overlap with the following paper also written by the authors or their collaborators: gr-qc/0506061.

The previous version of this article was a first attempt to confront the Dark Gravity theory to cosmological data. However, more recent developments lead to the conclusion that the cosmological principle is probably not valid in Dark…

A common belief about big-bang cosmology is that the cosmological redshift cannot be properly viewed as a Doppler shift (that is, as evidence for a recession velocity), but must be viewed in terms of the stretching of space. We argue that,…

This paper has been withdrawn. (Reason) Its contents have been entirely superseded by the contents of the articles arXiv:0809.3444 and arXiv:0705.3070. There is no profitable reason to keep it alive. No material on it is however wrong.