中文
相关论文

相关论文: The author replies

200 篇论文

We reply to the comment cond-mat/9902073 by Ben-Naim and Krapivsky on our paper cond-mat/9901130. We show that their arguments are incorrect, and present more numerical results to back our earlier conclusions.

统计力学 · 物理学 2007-05-23 G. Manoj , P. Ray

This correspondence answers the criticisms raised in McGaugh et al 2018 and Kroupa et al 2018.

星系天体物理 · 物理学 2018-12-04 Davi C. Rodrigues , Valerio Marra , Antonino Del Popolo , Zahra Davari

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

高能物理 - 唯象学 · 物理学 2007-05-23 A. E. Inopin

A response to a letter to the editor by Schilling regarding Bartroff, Lorden, and Wang ("Optimal and fast confidence intervals for hypergeometric successes" 2022, arXiv:2109.05624)

统计方法学 · 统计学 2024-01-23 Jay Bartroff , Gary Lorden , Lijia Wang

We investigate the validity of the square rooting procedure of the staggered determinant in the context of the Schwinger model. We find some evidence that at fixed physical quark mass the square root of the staggered determinant becomes…

高能物理 - 格点 · 物理学 2009-11-10 Stephan Dürr , Christian Hoelbling

The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.

介观与纳米尺度物理 · 物理学 2007-08-29 E. G. Mishchenko

We hope here to provide the community with a convenient account of our viewpoint on the claims made by Chen et al. about our results on two-dimensional polar flocks.

软凝聚态物质 · 物理学 2025-04-21 Hugues Chaté , Alexandre Solon

A Comment on the Letter by Victor Gurarie and Alexander E. Lobkovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 178301 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

软凝聚态物质 · 物理学 2015-05-25 Doru Constantin , Robert Hołyst

Comment on the Letter by M. Franz and Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.87, p.257003 (2001).

强关联电子 · 物理学 2009-11-10 D. V. Khveshchenko

Reply to a comment by T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W von Keyserlingk [arXiv:2010.07969].

强关联电子 · 物理学 2021-06-16 Marko Znidaric

We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.

量子物理 · 物理学 2012-05-08 D. Li , X. Li , H. Huang , X. Li

Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147

强关联电子 · 物理学 2007-05-23 Martin Greiter , Dirk Schuricht

This article is a reply to the Comment by D. Spemann et al (arXiv:1204.2992) in response to our paper 'Revealing common artifacts due to ferromagnetic inclusions in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite' (EPL, 97 (2012) 47001).

介观与纳米尺度物理 · 物理学 2012-06-21 M. Sepioni , R. R. Nair , I. -Ling Tsai , A. K. Geim , I. V. Grigorieva

A reply to the comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 279701 (2011), arXiv:1206.5372] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

强关联电子 · 物理学 2012-07-06 Andreas Hackl , Matthias Vojta

The Comment to the Letter "Excitons in Molecular Aggregates with Levy Disorder: Anomalous Localization and Exchange Broadening of Optical Spectra" appeared in Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 259701 (submitted on November 28, 2011). I prepared the…

无序系统与神经网络 · 物理学 2016-06-07 Agnieszka Werpachowska

John Bell's emphasis of the essential ambiguities in anomaly calculations is recalled. Some descendants of the anomaly are reviewed.

高能物理 - 理论 · 物理学 2007-05-23 R. Jackiw

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

统计力学 · 物理学 2009-11-10 Malte Henkel , Michel Pleimling

In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.

量子气体 · 物理学 2017-02-08 Kaspar Sakmann , Mark Kasevich

I give an account of my involvement with the chiral anomaly, and with the nonrenormalization theorem for the chiral anomaly and the all orders calculation of the trace anomaly, as well as related work by others. I then briefly discuss…

高能物理 - 理论 · 物理学 2016-11-23 Stephen L. Adler