English

Some questions on global distinction for $\mathrm{SL}(n)$

Number Theory 2020-12-04 v2 Representation Theory

Abstract

Let E/FE/F be a quadratic extension of number fields and let π\pi be an SLn(AF)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{A}_F)-distinguished cuspidal automorphic representation of SLn(AE)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{A}_E). Using an unfolding argument, we prove that an element of the L\mathrm{L}-packet of π\pi is distinguished if and only if it is ψ\psi-generic for a non-degenerate character ψ\psi of Nn(AE)N_n(\mathbb{A}_E) trivial on Nn(E+AF)N_n(E+\mathbb{A}_F), where NnN_n is the group of unipotent upper triangular matrices of SLn\mathrm{SL}_n. We then use this result to analyze the non-vanishing of the period integral on different realizations of a distinguished cuspidal automorphic representation of SLn(AE)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{A}_E) with multiplicity >1> 1, and show that in general some canonical copies of a distinguished representation inside different L\mathrm{L}-packets can have vanishing period. We also construct examples of everywhere locally distinguished representations of SLn(AE)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{A}_E) the L\mathrm{L}-packets of which do not contain any distinguished representation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1906.11560,
  title  = {Some questions on global distinction for $\mathrm{SL}(n)$},
  author = {U. K. Anandavardhanan and Nadir Matringe},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11560},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

To be merged with arXiv:2010.05678 and completed and simplified there, in particular we get rid of the Grunwald-Wang assumption

R2 v1 2026-06-23T10:05:13.847Z