English

Supercuspidal representations of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ distinguished by a Galois involution

Representation Theory 2019-09-25 v2

Abstract

Let F/F0F/F_0 be a quadratic extension of non-Archimedean locally compact fields of residual characteristic p2p\neq2, and let σ\sigma denote its non-trivial automorphism. Let RR be an algebraically closed field of characteristic different from pp. To any cuspidal representation π\pi of GLn(F){\rm GL}_n(F), with coefficients in RR, such that πσπ\pi^{\sigma}\simeq\pi^{\vee} (such a representation is said to be σ\sigma-selfdual) we associate a quadratic extension D/D0D/D_0, where DD is a tamely ramified extension of FF and D0D_0 is a tamely ramified extension of F0F_0, together with a quadratic character of D0×D_0^{\times}. When π\pi is supercuspidal, we give a necessary and sufficient condition, in terms of these data, for π\pi to be GLn(F0){\rm GL}_n(F_0)-distinguished. When the characteristic \ell of RR is not 22, denoting by ω\omega the non-trivial RR-character of F0×F_0^{\times} trivial on F/F0F/F_0-norms, we prove that any σ\sigma-selfdual supercuspidal RR-representation is either distinguished or ω\omega-distinguished, but not both. In the modular case, that is when >0\ell>0, we give examples of σ\sigma-selfdual cuspidal non-supercuspidal representations which are not distinguished nor ω\omega-distinguished. In the particular case where RR is the field of complex numbers, in which case all cuspidal representations are supercuspidal, this gives a complete distinction criterion for arbitrary complex cuspidal representations, as well as a purely local proof, for cuspidal representations, of the dichotomy and disjunction theorem due to Kable and Anandavardhanan-Kable-Tandon.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1807.07482,
  title  = {Supercuspidal representations of ${\rm GL}_n(F)$ distinguished by a Galois involution},
  author = {Vincent Sécherre},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.07482},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

56 pages