Some Comments on the Slater number
Combinatorics
2016-08-17 v1
Abstract
Let G be a graph with degree sequence d1≥…≥dn. Slater proposed sℓ(G)=min{s:(d1+1)+⋯+(ds+1)≥n} as a lower bound on the domination number γ(G) of G. We show that deciding the equality of γ(G) and sℓ(G) for a given graph G is NP-complete but that one can decide efficiently whether γ(G)>sℓ(G) or γ(G)≤(⌈ln(sℓ(G)n(G))⌉+1)sℓ(G). For real numbers α and β with α≥max{0,β}, let G(α,β) be the class of non-null graphs G such that every non-null subgraph H of G has at most αn(H)−β many edges. Generalizing a result of Desormeaux, Haynes, and Henning, we show that γ(G)≤(2α+1)sℓ(G)−2β for every graph G in G(α,β) with α≤23. Furthermore, we show that γ(G)/sℓ(G) is bounded for graphs G in G(α,β) if and only if α<2. For an outerplanar graph G with sℓ(G)≥2, we show γ(G)≤6sℓ(G)−6. In analogy to sℓ(G), we propose sℓt(G)=min{s:d1+⋯+ds≥n} as a lower bound on the total domination number. Strengthening results due to Raczek as well as Chellali and Haynes, we show that sℓt(T)≥2n+2−n1 for every tree T of order n at least 2 with n1 endvertices.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1608.04560,
title = {Some Comments on the Slater number},
author = {Michael Gentner and Dieter Rautenbach},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.04560},
year = {2016}
}